Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Environ Sci Health B ; 52(8): 547-556, 2017 Aug 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28489976

RESUMO

The reproducibility of extraction of residues from spiked soil samples and from soils containing incurred residues was tested with 14C-labeled test compounds of different physical-chemical properties. Nearly 100% of the compounds added to the sample before extraction could be recovered with an average reproducibility relative standard deviation (CV) of 5.4%. The additional steps of the determination process (cleanup, evaporation, etc.) contributed to the major part of the variability of the results (CV = 10-20%). The incurred residues were most efficiently extracted with acetone for 30 min followed by the mixture of acetone/ethyl acetate 1:1 for additional 30 min. However, they could only be recovered at various extent (64-90% of total residues), underlying the importance of testing the efficiency of extraction. The residues were identified and quantified by gas chromatography applying thermionic detector. The performance parameters of the method complied with the international method validation guidelines, and they proved to be robust and suitable for determination of pesticide residues in soils of widely different physical-chemical properties.


Assuntos
Resíduos de Praguicidas/isolamento & purificação , Poluentes do Solo/isolamento & purificação , Acetona/química , Atrazina/química , Atrazina/isolamento & purificação , Radioisótopos de Carbono , Hexanos/química , Resíduos de Praguicidas/química , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Solo/química , Poluentes do Solo/química , Solventes/química
3.
J Agric Food Chem ; 63(18): 4418-28, 2015 May 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25658668

RESUMO

The uncertainty of pesticide residue levels in crops due to sampling, estimated for 106 individual crops and 24 crop groups from residue data obtained from supervised trials, was adjusted with a factor of 1.3 to accommodate the larger variability of residues under normal field conditions. Further adjustment may be necessary in the case of mixed lots. The combined uncertainty of residue data including the contribution of sampling is used for calculation of an action limit, which should not be exceeded when compliance with maximum residue limits is certified as part of premarketing self-control programs. On the contrary, for testing compliance of marketed commodities the residues measured in composite samples should be greater than or equal to the decision limit calculated only from the combined uncertainty of the laboratory phase of the residue determination. The options of minimizing the combined uncertainty of measured residues are discussed. The principles described are also applicable to other chemical contaminants.


Assuntos
Produtos Agrícolas/química , Contaminação de Alimentos/análise , Resíduos de Praguicidas/análise , Produtos Agrícolas/economia , Contaminação de Alimentos/economia , Contaminação de Alimentos/legislação & jurisprudência , Resíduos de Praguicidas/normas
4.
J Environ Sci Health B ; 41(5): 531-52, 2006.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16785165

RESUMO

The efficiency of four sample processing methods was tested with eight different types of soils representing the major proportion of cultivated soils. The principle of sampling constant was applied for characterizing the efficiency of the procedures and testing the well-mixed status of the prepared soil. The test material was 14C-labeled atrazine that enabled keeping the random error of analyses

Assuntos
Atrazina/análise , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/normas , Resíduos de Praguicidas/análise , Poluentes do Solo/análise , Radioisótopos de Carbono , Matemática , Estudos de Amostragem , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...